The complete original article below, “Was ist zu tun?” (“What is there to do?”), which was excerpted on PI-German, can be found on EwK: Einwanderungskritik. Those living in the United States are having a strikingly similar problem with the media and politicians refusing to represent the will of Americans, and thus this article is worth reading. Just plug the word ‘American’ in in place of ‘German’ where it occurs.
What is there to do?
Every day, I get E-mails from concerned citizens who ask what can be done against the conversion of Germany into a multinational country. Every one of these citizens has experienced in the recent months that this country has only disdain for their democratic participation.
One has to be an especially big dreamer to believe that some movement is being accomplished through the establishment of parties or by means of great demonstrations. Neither the AfD [Alternative for Germany] nor PEGIDA [Patriots Against the Islamization of the Western World] can motivate our politicians and elite to curb somewhat the present mass migration to Central Europe.
Critics of immigration are being disparaged, shut out and ignored – no matter whether they give intelligent or stupid arguments. In the program “titel – these – temperamente [Titles – Themes – Temperaments]” (ttt) that ran on the First [German Radio Network] until the later hours, I, for example, was called a “firebug.” The taxpayer-funded radio station wasn’t at all interested in what I had to say in previous weeks about the outbreaks of violence and attacks on refugee camps. Nobody asked about that.
Frustration or Radicalization
There is a strategy behind this: It is supposed to cause that nonconformists in the German Republic draw back out of frustration from unsuccessful protests or become so radicalized that the “normal citizen” just looks away in repulsion and the mainstream remain faithful due to lack of alternatives.
This very strategy was picked up on at PEGIDA: Of the 25,000 demonstrators at the beginning of January, not much more is left, even though the conditions have continued to worsen. Those who remain at home are doing so most of all out of frustration. A suddenly discovered agreement with the German refugee policy can be completely ruled out. Furthermore, a change in ton can be felt among those that take to the streets each Monday. I want to be totally honest here: Sometimes I find the language employed to be distasteful even though I understand the rage of the people.
Only an uprising by those with reason, though, will be able to put an end to the uncontrolled mass immigration. Violent riots as well as insulting expressions only serve the political-media class in being able to draw the image of the hateful Germans and use this to justify the current catastrophic policy.
Silence as a Form of Protest
Just what does that mean? We can’t let our country fall into the trap. Neither retreat nor radicalization will help us achieve our concerns. Each one of us should engage ourselves with friends in those things he finds right and very carefully consider each word said. When in doubt, it is better to pick silence as a form of protest than to come across negatively by way of a clash.
I still remember very well how disappointed the political-media class was at the beginnings of PEGIDA, when nobody wanted to speak with the “press of lies,” and Lutz Bachmann knew how to put the brakes on his followers so that the right messages could be sent out by the end of the evening.
That was exemplary. But those who are of the persuasion of wanting rather to join a party should do that. As long as the message is right it is also of secondary importance whether a demonstration takes place in front of a refugee center or a parliament. Our message needs to be heard all over: in the shopping zone, on the Internet, in parliament, in front of the school that is being turned into a refugee camp – everywhere!
The Right Message and the Right Tone
The greatest problem with this still continues to be that too many citizens are letting themselves be intimidated by the welcoming propaganda and are finding no places to go where they can join in with like-minded reasonable positions. Even though several such places of course do exist, there needs to be many more, and their messages need to have a clearer ring in spite of all the understandable outrage.
Our core statement needs to read: Germany is a cosmopolitan land, however it cannot accept every person in the world seeking refuge because this will hurt everyone: the countries of origin, the migrants themselves, and of course the receiving countries as well. Much more, we need to develop a policy that makes as its goal that every person would rather live in his own homeland.
Criticism of immigration, therefore, intends neither to go back to an allegedly better past nor to limit itself to going about whining without suggesting solutions. Much more, it is visionary because it has recognized that seven, or eight or perhaps even ten billion people can only halfway peacefully live on this earth if mass refugee movements and the mixing of nations is to be most completely hindered. In the long term, this must not be the only permitted solution.
A New World Order of Differences
We need to strive beyond provisions of security for a world order that allows the various peoples their freedom to go their own way. On the basis of this, immigration critics must deal with globalization and resist the mania of harmonizing a diverse world of differences.
At this point, there are no independent organizations that represent such a program. It is time for this to change. On one hand, we need to convey positions critical of immigration to the existing parties and protest alliances, on the other hand, a loophole needs in the intermediate term to be closed: While there are countless nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) that advocate for mass immigration (i.e. PRO ASYL, Amnesty International, …), it is vain to search for an opposing organization.
Let’s form this opposing organization! For our protest, we will need courage and understanding, but that of course is not enough. If our government will no longer represent the interests of the Germans, then new structures and organizations need to come about that do this!
Excerpt of original article on PI-German / Translation of whole article: Anders Denken